All Saints: "Hospitality and Discipleship: Can we Do Both?"
Daniel 7:1-3, 15-18;
Psalm 149;
Ephesians 1:11-23;
Luke 6:20-31
Preached by the Rev. Preston Parsons
I am someone who genuinely wants everyone to like me, and there is a part of me that wants to please everyone. (That might come as a surprise to some of you!) Part of me
that wants everyone to speak well of me. Sometimes I think that being liked by everyone would be a blessing, that it would be a blessing to be popular. A lot of Christians think this way, I think. Like it would be a blessing for everyone to just like us.
We are often motivated by hospitality, and welcome, and inclusion, as though the more welcoming we are, the more people will like us; and the more people like us, the more we might become an inclusive community. So the church is motivated by righteous desires, when we want people to like us.
And we should be hospitable. There is something very Christian about it, to welcome people, to be friendly.
It made me wonder, as I prepared this sermon – maybe we should begin to shed all of our unfriendly burdens. There’s so many ways that we could be even more blessed because people would like us so much more, if only we gave up things like (oh I don't know) anything distinct about being a Christian, like our belief in the divinity of Christ, or the bodily resurrection, or that pesky doctrine of the Trinity, say – all those difficult doctrines that can make Christianity so unpalatable to others. Then, people would like us, right?
I even wondered if we should give up on being good disciples, give up on living godly lives, give up on repenting for our sins, or even trying to follow Jesus. Isn’t it all just a barrier to others? Wouldn’t we rather be more like the world around us, wouldn’t we rather have everyone like us? And for people to like us, isn’t that to be blessed?
Perhaps – is it better to be sub-Christian and liked by all, than to be robustly Christian?
***
There is some logic to that, right? Minimizing our differences could make us more hospitable and friendly. It’s sure easier to get along if it’s difficult to tell the difference between Christians and the non-religious, between Christians and those of other religions. Wouldn’t minimizing our differences please others and make them feel welcome?
I wish it could be that easy. But I’ve got bad news for you. As a person who has tried and struggled with keeping everyone happy, I’ve discovered a few things. And if you've ever tried to please everyone around you, this will probably sound familiar: It's never possible to please everyone. Some people will never be pleased anyway. And in the end,
the attempt to please everyone often turns you into a person without principle.
When a person, or a community, has principles, it means saying no when some would have you say yes, and saying yes when people would have you say no. Believing in something that others don’t believe means being a person, or a community, of distinct character. It means being, believing, and acting in a way that people may not always like because there is something larger at stake than being liked by all.
***
Today we read Jesus's sermon on the plain, a summary of discipleship that does not seem to be all that concerned with pleasing anybody at all – even Jesus’s disciples, I imagine. You're not blessed when everyone likes you – not according to Jesus, in this particular sermon if his – instead, you're blessed "when people hate you, and when they exclude you, revile you, and defame you" for his sake. "Woe to you,” says Jesus, “when all speak well of you, for that is what their ancestors did to the false prophets.”
Jesus is not so concerned with everyone liking you; in fact, Jesus calls anyone who is universally loved a false prophet –because to be universally liked is to be without much principle, to be like by all is to always tell people what they want to hear. This will inevitably make you a liar to some people, some of the time.
Jesus doesn’t stop there: Jesus then lists some very hard, difficult, perhaps entirely impossible demands of discipleship:
Bless those who curse you. Pray for those who abuse you. Turn the other cheek. If someone steals your coat, give them your shirt too. Give to the beggars, and never, ever, ask for any of it back.
Tried that lately?
**
It looks like this kind of discipleship means not being hospitable or accommodating at all. that kind of demand is not going to be all that compelling to all strangers.
So it makes me wonder: which is it? Should we, in the interest of good Christian hospitality, conform ourselves to the ways of the world? Or should we become radical disciples, unconcerned with hospitality, or inclusion, or welcome at all? Should we find something in between, where we are kind of welcoming because we are kind of Christian disciples? Or kind of Christian disciples in order to be a little more welcoming?
I don’t have an easy answer to this, except to say that it seems to me that these two things, hospitality and discipleship, are in considerable tension, all the time. It seems hard to be both, despite the fact that God calls us to be both hospitable and disciplined.
***
When Paul calls us “to set our hope on Christ,” “the hope to which God has called” us, what he is asking us to be is a community of welcome, and a place of reconciliation: just as the world was reconciled to God in Christ in the resurrection, just as Jesus goes from death to life, so we are united as the body of Christ, and called to a new way of discipleship. We are called, in the body of Christ, to reconcile those who are near with those who are far.
The tension is there, between discipleship and welcome, but as it turns out we don’t understand one without the other. For Paul, reconciliation is a spiritual discipline, and the spiritual discipline of reconciliation is only understood within the context of the doctrine of the resurrection, that utterly unique Christian teaching about what the world is really to be like. Just as the world is reconciled to God in the resurrection, where the life of the world is welcomed into the life of God, so we too work for reconciliation amongst each other, and between the body of Christ and the world.
We could throw the Christian teaching about the Trinity in there too: by way of a solid understanding of the life of God as fundamentally a life of mutuality among three persons, Father Son and Holy Spirit, by that we grasp what Christian discipleship is, the work of deepening our own relationships and modeling them on the divine life by way of our welcoming of others, being reconciled with each other. By this we become something more than we were before: reconciled to God and one another.
Do you see it?
Being disciples, being a people sanctified by the work of God in Christ, moves us to do the work of reconciliation. True hospitality comes out of being more of a Christian disciple, true hospitality comes out of being more of a Christian believer, not less of one.
Christian discipleship and Christian believing is strangely both in tension with hospitality, let’s not deny that – but more fundamentally, Christian discipleship and believing is the reason for our hospitality, and the way we learn how to do it!
And by this call to be disciples , we will probably not always be popular; but we will be blessed, having the true freedom from saying anything or doing anything to please others. We will be blessed by the freedom to walk with God, the freedom to become Christian disciples, and the freedom to become who God is calling us to be: open, welcoming, and reconciled to the world around us, and by this, reconciled to God.
Sunday, November 04, 2007
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Proper 23 (28) (2007): "The Church in Exile"
Proper 23 (28) (2007): "The Church in Exile"
Jeremiah 29:1, 4-7; Psalm 66:1-12; 2 Timothy 2:8-15; Luke 17:11-19
preached by the Rev. Preston Parsons
As I finish up this series on Jeremiah today, I thought it is a good a time as any to let you know why think that Jeremiah is so important to us, and why I’ve chosen to preach these last few of Sundays on Jeremiah.
Why Jeremiah is so important for us, in this parish and in the church more broadly, can be summed up in one word: exile. Jeremiah is important for us to read and listen to because Jeremiah speaks to a people making the transition between establishment and exile, a people making the shift away from security and into uncertainty. My hope is that by way of Jeremiah we will be able to make those same transitions, that we too will move from establishment and security, into uncertainty and exile.
Strange hope, isn’t it. Strange to hope that we might become less established, and less secure. But remember that Jeremiah hoped for the same thing – but not because he had any great desire to actually be in exile. Rather, Jeremiah’s desire was for the people to see the truth of their situation, and the truth was that the people were about to go into exile. Similarly, if we took a moment to look around us, we would also see that we act like the church is still a well established cultural force, that we are far more secure than we are, when whether we like it, want it, desire it or not, the church is well on her way into exile from the culture and the world around us. This is true here, locally at St. Mary Magdalene.
So, what do you think? Are you used to thinking this way about the church? Are you used to thinking that we are a people in exile? Is it safe to say that not that long ago, Christianity and the practices associated with Christianity, were much more common? That more people used to go to church? That most of our public institutions, like schools and places of government, wouldn't see much conflict between being a good citizen and being a Christian?
It’s fair to say that not that long ago it was respectable to be a Christian. The church could assume that people would come to worship, because that's what good citizens did. We came to church, and we prayed in school. And no civil servant, MP or MLA, would get publicly derided for getting together with other Christians to pray. You could baptize children with the assumption that they would absorb Christian values outside the church as well as in Sunday School. You could marry people assuming that the surrounding culture would support marriage as a fundamentally Christian institution.
But those days are gone. We may not be physically uprooted like the people of Judah; we may not be suffering violence at the hands of a foreign army; but if we were honest about the world around us, we would see that Christianity is far from established, and we are far from secure. We are in an exile from a world where being a Christian can no longer be taken for granted, where nominal Christian values can no longer be assumed, and where it no longer makes sense to most people to darken the door of a church come Sunday morning.
There is no longer much social advantage to being a Christian: going to church isn’t going to get you that promotion; going to church won’t get you elected shop steward; and to pray in public might mean getting sneered at.
***
A few of us are going into the neighborhood to meet with local leaders of places like schools and community clubs. It's hard to describe what its like when I call people up and say "Hello, I'm calling from St. Mary Magdalene, a local Anglican parish. We'd love to come by and get to know you."
(And that is really what we're doing, too – simply hoping to get to know leaders in the neighbourhood, in order to build a sense of what the needs in St. Vital might be. They are meetings without agendas. We don't ask people to do anything, but to let us get to know them and to get a sense of their work.)
But whenever I call, and I say "I'm calling from St. Mary Magdalene . . ." there is a very awkward silence. An anxious silence. It's like people are thinking "what in the world do the Christians want with me . . ." The first response is not trust. The first response is not warmth. The first response is anxiety.
Now, so far so good. We haven’t been turfed out and no one has said no to meeting, nor do I expect they will. Once people realize that we genuinely just want to get to know them, people warm up. But I am coming away confirmed in my suspicion that we are now somewhere in-between establishment and exile, and that we can no longer assume that Christianity and the church is a meaningful and positive part of most people’s lives.
***
Am I depressing you yet? Probably, at least a little. Exile does suck. As we lose standing in the culture around us, we can no longer assume that people will just come to church (because that's just what folks do, they go to church), and when Christians are no longer automatically trusted, it really does suck for us!
But can you see why I've been preaching about truthfulness? So long as we operate like we are well-established, so long as we aren't truthful about our exile, we won't survive the cultural shift around us. We are going into exile, and the sooner we realize that, the better. So long as we assume that there is significant continuity between the culture around us and the practice of the Christian life, when there isn’t, we will shift with the culture right out of Christian practice!
This is why Jeremiah asks us over and over to remember the God who saves. When Jeremiah encourages us to remember what makes us the people of God – that we are a people who owe our lives to the saving God – Jeremiah helps us see that to love God does not always mean taking the world on its own terms.
***
In our reading for today Jeremiah is writing a letter to people in exile. When you’re in exile there are a number of temptations, as Jeremiah knew: one of the big ones is to cower in the corner in hopelessness. The world might not be totally against us when we are in exile; but it certainly isn’t for us, either. The first intuition of the world around us is not to support us in being Christian. And when this happens, we become tempted to take care of our own, to disengage from the communities around us, and to care for our immediate church family, longing for how things once were and romanticizing the past.
Shall we withdraw? Shall we think small, caring only for ourselves? There’s something in your heart that chafes at that, isn’t there. But to act like we are secure and established, like the world is on our side waiting to do us favours, will mean this: we will think small and ending up caring for ourselves by default.
But God would not have it be so. What God gives to that other community in exile – the one that Jeremiah wrote to – was a charge to think big. To take care of one another in the community of faith, to be sure – but not only to care for the community of faith. God called that people out of a closed sectarianism and into great responsibility, a missional responsibility.
“Seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile,” says God to the Israelites in Babylon, “and pray to the LORD on its behalf, for in [the] welfare [of Babylon] you will find your welfare." God asked that community of exiles not to despair, nor to think small, but to think big and to care for the strangers around them: because for Jeremiah and the prophets of the Old Testament, exile is where God promises a work of profound newness – exile is where we find a newness grounded in the retrieval of the past, in our memory of the God who saves. Even if we find ourselves in a strange place and in an unfamiliar time.
To put it simply: exile is where God is most powerfully at work.
***
This too is my hope for us, and why I find Jeremiah such an important voice. Let us be truthful: the world is changing around us; much of the world is pretty lukewarm towards us; much of the world doesn’t care too much about what we’re doing.
But it is also my hope that this doesn’t lead us into despair, or lead us to think small.
My hope is that we think big, that we engage the welfare of the people around us, and that we take on this great responsibility that God gives us precisely when we are in exile: the responsibility for mission, the responsibility to care in a big way.
My hope is that we embrace our exile, because it is exactly here, through his call to faithfulness in Him where God's great hope for us is most strong; it is exactly here where God's great hope for the world around us is most strong; it is in exile, where we are now, that God is most powerfully at work.
Jeremiah 29:1, 4-7; Psalm 66:1-12; 2 Timothy 2:8-15; Luke 17:11-19
preached by the Rev. Preston Parsons
As I finish up this series on Jeremiah today, I thought it is a good a time as any to let you know why think that Jeremiah is so important to us, and why I’ve chosen to preach these last few of Sundays on Jeremiah.
Why Jeremiah is so important for us, in this parish and in the church more broadly, can be summed up in one word: exile. Jeremiah is important for us to read and listen to because Jeremiah speaks to a people making the transition between establishment and exile, a people making the shift away from security and into uncertainty. My hope is that by way of Jeremiah we will be able to make those same transitions, that we too will move from establishment and security, into uncertainty and exile.
Strange hope, isn’t it. Strange to hope that we might become less established, and less secure. But remember that Jeremiah hoped for the same thing – but not because he had any great desire to actually be in exile. Rather, Jeremiah’s desire was for the people to see the truth of their situation, and the truth was that the people were about to go into exile. Similarly, if we took a moment to look around us, we would also see that we act like the church is still a well established cultural force, that we are far more secure than we are, when whether we like it, want it, desire it or not, the church is well on her way into exile from the culture and the world around us. This is true here, locally at St. Mary Magdalene.
So, what do you think? Are you used to thinking this way about the church? Are you used to thinking that we are a people in exile? Is it safe to say that not that long ago, Christianity and the practices associated with Christianity, were much more common? That more people used to go to church? That most of our public institutions, like schools and places of government, wouldn't see much conflict between being a good citizen and being a Christian?
It’s fair to say that not that long ago it was respectable to be a Christian. The church could assume that people would come to worship, because that's what good citizens did. We came to church, and we prayed in school. And no civil servant, MP or MLA, would get publicly derided for getting together with other Christians to pray. You could baptize children with the assumption that they would absorb Christian values outside the church as well as in Sunday School. You could marry people assuming that the surrounding culture would support marriage as a fundamentally Christian institution.
But those days are gone. We may not be physically uprooted like the people of Judah; we may not be suffering violence at the hands of a foreign army; but if we were honest about the world around us, we would see that Christianity is far from established, and we are far from secure. We are in an exile from a world where being a Christian can no longer be taken for granted, where nominal Christian values can no longer be assumed, and where it no longer makes sense to most people to darken the door of a church come Sunday morning.
There is no longer much social advantage to being a Christian: going to church isn’t going to get you that promotion; going to church won’t get you elected shop steward; and to pray in public might mean getting sneered at.
***
A few of us are going into the neighborhood to meet with local leaders of places like schools and community clubs. It's hard to describe what its like when I call people up and say "Hello, I'm calling from St. Mary Magdalene, a local Anglican parish. We'd love to come by and get to know you."
(And that is really what we're doing, too – simply hoping to get to know leaders in the neighbourhood, in order to build a sense of what the needs in St. Vital might be. They are meetings without agendas. We don't ask people to do anything, but to let us get to know them and to get a sense of their work.)
But whenever I call, and I say "I'm calling from St. Mary Magdalene . . ." there is a very awkward silence. An anxious silence. It's like people are thinking "what in the world do the Christians want with me . . ." The first response is not trust. The first response is not warmth. The first response is anxiety.
Now, so far so good. We haven’t been turfed out and no one has said no to meeting, nor do I expect they will. Once people realize that we genuinely just want to get to know them, people warm up. But I am coming away confirmed in my suspicion that we are now somewhere in-between establishment and exile, and that we can no longer assume that Christianity and the church is a meaningful and positive part of most people’s lives.
***
Am I depressing you yet? Probably, at least a little. Exile does suck. As we lose standing in the culture around us, we can no longer assume that people will just come to church (because that's just what folks do, they go to church), and when Christians are no longer automatically trusted, it really does suck for us!
But can you see why I've been preaching about truthfulness? So long as we operate like we are well-established, so long as we aren't truthful about our exile, we won't survive the cultural shift around us. We are going into exile, and the sooner we realize that, the better. So long as we assume that there is significant continuity between the culture around us and the practice of the Christian life, when there isn’t, we will shift with the culture right out of Christian practice!
This is why Jeremiah asks us over and over to remember the God who saves. When Jeremiah encourages us to remember what makes us the people of God – that we are a people who owe our lives to the saving God – Jeremiah helps us see that to love God does not always mean taking the world on its own terms.
***
In our reading for today Jeremiah is writing a letter to people in exile. When you’re in exile there are a number of temptations, as Jeremiah knew: one of the big ones is to cower in the corner in hopelessness. The world might not be totally against us when we are in exile; but it certainly isn’t for us, either. The first intuition of the world around us is not to support us in being Christian. And when this happens, we become tempted to take care of our own, to disengage from the communities around us, and to care for our immediate church family, longing for how things once were and romanticizing the past.
Shall we withdraw? Shall we think small, caring only for ourselves? There’s something in your heart that chafes at that, isn’t there. But to act like we are secure and established, like the world is on our side waiting to do us favours, will mean this: we will think small and ending up caring for ourselves by default.
But God would not have it be so. What God gives to that other community in exile – the one that Jeremiah wrote to – was a charge to think big. To take care of one another in the community of faith, to be sure – but not only to care for the community of faith. God called that people out of a closed sectarianism and into great responsibility, a missional responsibility.
“Seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile,” says God to the Israelites in Babylon, “and pray to the LORD on its behalf, for in [the] welfare [of Babylon] you will find your welfare." God asked that community of exiles not to despair, nor to think small, but to think big and to care for the strangers around them: because for Jeremiah and the prophets of the Old Testament, exile is where God promises a work of profound newness – exile is where we find a newness grounded in the retrieval of the past, in our memory of the God who saves. Even if we find ourselves in a strange place and in an unfamiliar time.
To put it simply: exile is where God is most powerfully at work.
***
This too is my hope for us, and why I find Jeremiah such an important voice. Let us be truthful: the world is changing around us; much of the world is pretty lukewarm towards us; much of the world doesn’t care too much about what we’re doing.
But it is also my hope that this doesn’t lead us into despair, or lead us to think small.
My hope is that we think big, that we engage the welfare of the people around us, and that we take on this great responsibility that God gives us precisely when we are in exile: the responsibility for mission, the responsibility to care in a big way.
My hope is that we embrace our exile, because it is exactly here, through his call to faithfulness in Him where God's great hope for us is most strong; it is exactly here where God's great hope for the world around us is most strong; it is in exile, where we are now, that God is most powerfully at work.
Sunday, July 08, 2007
Proper 9 (14) (2007): "Being the Body"
Proper 9 (14) (2007): "Being the Body"
2 Kings 5:1-14; Psalm 30; Galatians 6:(1-6), 7-16; Luke 10:1-11, 16-20
preached by the Rev. Preston Parsons, July 8th, 2007
I'm going to start this morning by talking about a finger. It is an especially long finger. This finger belongs to John the Baptist, and it is in a painting by a painter by the name of Grunewald. In this painting, just above John the Baptist's hand, read the words "He must increase, I must decrease."
Where is John the Baptist's finger pointing? It points to Jesus, but not only Jesus: but to Jesus on the cross. John the Baptist, with his long index finger, points to Christ crucified.
It was the favourite painting of one of the greatest theologians of the 20th century, Karl Barth, because for Barth this was the task of any theologian, any preacher: to point. To point away from him or herself, and to Christ crucified.
By this action of pointing, the priest, the preacher, and the church, all live up to our vocation, becoming what we are pointing to – we become the body of Christ by pointing to Christ and the cross.
***
I think it's about time to talk about preaching. And after that, to talk about the eucharist, and get some preliminaries clear about the role of the priest and the preacher.
I'd like for us to begin by turning to Galatians, specifically to verse 14 and 15 in chapter 6, where Paul writes: "May I never boast of anything except the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. For neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is anything; but a new creation is everything!"
Paul's opponents were claiming converts to the Mosaic law. They were counting circumcisions because circumcision was the first observation of the law for any convert to the law.
But for Paul, there is no boasting, no story to tell, no story about his success, no personal illustration apart from the cross of Christ and new creation in the resurrection. Paul does not wish to tell any story, to boast and tell personal anecdotes about himself or what he has accomplished in the Galatians:
"May I never boast of anything except the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. For neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is anything; but a new creation is everything!"
And in the end, this is his only story, and if he has a personal story to tell, it is about how the world has been crucified to him, and him to the world, but only through the cross of Christ. All other stories, his own, and the story of the Galatians,and the story of the whole world, is known only through the cross of Christ and his resurrection.
***
I spoke about this last week, about the central story Christians tell. The story central to our faith is that of the crucifixion of Christ, and that of the resurrection. This narrative, this story is the story that makes sense of our whole lives as Christians. This is the story that precedes and makes sense of our experience. This is how we make sense of scripture
and the life of the church. The story of the crucifixion is how we make sense of the world, of history. It is all made sense through the cross of Christ, the central event around which all things turn.
As Paul writes, the story of the crucifixion and the resurrection is the only story we really have to tell, the only story the church has to tell, the only one the preacher has to tell: Christ crucified, Christ resurrected.
Crucifixion and resurrection is the central story by which we identify ourselves, because to know and tell this story is to know Christ, it is to know how to be the body of Christ, it is to be who we are.
What we point to is what we become.
***
Think of baptism. In our baptism we die, and rise, in Christ. All identity outside our being in Christ, being dead and raised through baptism, anything besides this is peripheral. Our true self is now the one hidden in Christ, the one who died and rose again.
Further, this central narrative of the Christian life, that of Christ's crucifixion and his resurrection, your experience of this, our experience of this, our becoming what we point to is not a personal experience.
First of all, any experience that we have of the death and resurrection of Christ is already shared – because it is Christ who is crucified and resurrected first, and we share in that experience.
Secondly, even before it is personally shared, it is ecclesial – it is the experience of the church, it is the experience of the body of Christ.
We become what we are pointing to through our elder and experienced Christians, the ones who have learned the way of Christ's crucifixion and resurrection lived daily, and lived in hope.
But we also become, not just through the example of our elders in the faith, but it is also made true by the way we read the Psalms together, especially Psalms like the one we just read, Psalm 30. When we read the Psalms together, we read them as the body of Christ, the same Psalms that Jesus quotes n his life and on the cross. And we become this living and suffering body of Christ when we say together such things as:
“I will exalt you, O Lord,
because you have lifted me up *
and have not let my enemies triumph over me.
O Lord my God, I cried out to you, *
and you restored me to health.
You brought me up, O Lord, from the dead.”
This is the story, the one Paul insisted on boasting in rather than his own good deeds, the story of the one who is lifted up from the grave, the one whose enemies do not triumph, the one who cried out in pain, the one whose life was restored, the one who is the Christ, Jesus the crucified one, Jesus the risen one: through the Psalms, we point to Christ; and by this pointing, and speaking the words, we become the community of the crucified.
***
So what about the preacher?
Let's talk about the kind of preaching that is truthful to the task that is set before the preacher.
The truthful preacher will not tell personal stories, so much as he will always be pointing,
like John the Baptist in that painting by Grunewald, pointing to the crucified one. Because if the preacher points to him or herself, the cause is lost.
"He must increase." This is the story of Christ.
"I must decrease." This is not about me.
The proclamation of the church embodied in her preachers does not reveal the preacher nor the Scriptures. The proclamation reveals Christ, and him crucified.
"May I never boast of anything
except the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ".
"a new creation is everything!"
Likewise, when you see the presider at the table, you better not be caught looking at him. Preaching is not about the preacher, neither is presiding about the presider. I'll be at that altar in a few minutes. And when I'm praying that great prayer of thanksgiving for you, don't look at me. Don't care about my voice. Don't care about my haircut.
No – Look at the cross. Look at the altar. Look at the bread and wine. Look there because that is how we do what we do, this is how we live out the Christian vocation, as a church, as a baptized people, a people baptized into the death and resurrection of Christ, this is how we do crucifixion and resurrection: we signify our lives of crucifixion and resurrection by passing through the waters of baptism to our place at this table, participating in the crucifixion and the resurrection, at this table becoming what we point to.
We remember God's acts in history, we remember his crucifixion, we remember is resurrection, and we do what he asked us to do: "This is my body which is broken for you." "This is my blood which is shed for you.” Take and eat. Take and drink. "When you do this, you do this in remembrance of me."
Look at what is being pointed to: Christ and his crucifixion, the resurrection of Christ, each remembered and made true at this altar.
Take and eat, take and drink, become the body of Christ.
Because this is what makes us who we are: not the preacher, not the presider. We are made Christ, as we reveal and witness to Christ, the crucifixion and the resurrection become our own by pointing to the one greater than us, and by this pointing to the one greater than we are, by speaking his words, by participating in him at this table, then we become the one who has been lifted up from the dead, we become the body of Christ, and him crucified.
2 Kings 5:1-14; Psalm 30; Galatians 6:(1-6), 7-16; Luke 10:1-11, 16-20
preached by the Rev. Preston Parsons, July 8th, 2007
I'm going to start this morning by talking about a finger. It is an especially long finger. This finger belongs to John the Baptist, and it is in a painting by a painter by the name of Grunewald. In this painting, just above John the Baptist's hand, read the words "He must increase, I must decrease."
Where is John the Baptist's finger pointing? It points to Jesus, but not only Jesus: but to Jesus on the cross. John the Baptist, with his long index finger, points to Christ crucified.
It was the favourite painting of one of the greatest theologians of the 20th century, Karl Barth, because for Barth this was the task of any theologian, any preacher: to point. To point away from him or herself, and to Christ crucified.
By this action of pointing, the priest, the preacher, and the church, all live up to our vocation, becoming what we are pointing to – we become the body of Christ by pointing to Christ and the cross.
***
I think it's about time to talk about preaching. And after that, to talk about the eucharist, and get some preliminaries clear about the role of the priest and the preacher.
I'd like for us to begin by turning to Galatians, specifically to verse 14 and 15 in chapter 6, where Paul writes: "May I never boast of anything except the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. For neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is anything; but a new creation is everything!"
Paul's opponents were claiming converts to the Mosaic law. They were counting circumcisions because circumcision was the first observation of the law for any convert to the law.
But for Paul, there is no boasting, no story to tell, no story about his success, no personal illustration apart from the cross of Christ and new creation in the resurrection. Paul does not wish to tell any story, to boast and tell personal anecdotes about himself or what he has accomplished in the Galatians:
"May I never boast of anything except the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. For neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is anything; but a new creation is everything!"
And in the end, this is his only story, and if he has a personal story to tell, it is about how the world has been crucified to him, and him to the world, but only through the cross of Christ. All other stories, his own, and the story of the Galatians,and the story of the whole world, is known only through the cross of Christ and his resurrection.
***
I spoke about this last week, about the central story Christians tell. The story central to our faith is that of the crucifixion of Christ, and that of the resurrection. This narrative, this story is the story that makes sense of our whole lives as Christians. This is the story that precedes and makes sense of our experience. This is how we make sense of scripture
and the life of the church. The story of the crucifixion is how we make sense of the world, of history. It is all made sense through the cross of Christ, the central event around which all things turn.
As Paul writes, the story of the crucifixion and the resurrection is the only story we really have to tell, the only story the church has to tell, the only one the preacher has to tell: Christ crucified, Christ resurrected.
Crucifixion and resurrection is the central story by which we identify ourselves, because to know and tell this story is to know Christ, it is to know how to be the body of Christ, it is to be who we are.
What we point to is what we become.
***
Think of baptism. In our baptism we die, and rise, in Christ. All identity outside our being in Christ, being dead and raised through baptism, anything besides this is peripheral. Our true self is now the one hidden in Christ, the one who died and rose again.
Further, this central narrative of the Christian life, that of Christ's crucifixion and his resurrection, your experience of this, our experience of this, our becoming what we point to is not a personal experience.
First of all, any experience that we have of the death and resurrection of Christ is already shared – because it is Christ who is crucified and resurrected first, and we share in that experience.
Secondly, even before it is personally shared, it is ecclesial – it is the experience of the church, it is the experience of the body of Christ.
We become what we are pointing to through our elder and experienced Christians, the ones who have learned the way of Christ's crucifixion and resurrection lived daily, and lived in hope.
But we also become, not just through the example of our elders in the faith, but it is also made true by the way we read the Psalms together, especially Psalms like the one we just read, Psalm 30. When we read the Psalms together, we read them as the body of Christ, the same Psalms that Jesus quotes n his life and on the cross. And we become this living and suffering body of Christ when we say together such things as:
“I will exalt you, O Lord,
because you have lifted me up *
and have not let my enemies triumph over me.
O Lord my God, I cried out to you, *
and you restored me to health.
You brought me up, O Lord, from the dead.”
This is the story, the one Paul insisted on boasting in rather than his own good deeds, the story of the one who is lifted up from the grave, the one whose enemies do not triumph, the one who cried out in pain, the one whose life was restored, the one who is the Christ, Jesus the crucified one, Jesus the risen one: through the Psalms, we point to Christ; and by this pointing, and speaking the words, we become the community of the crucified.
***
So what about the preacher?
Let's talk about the kind of preaching that is truthful to the task that is set before the preacher.
The truthful preacher will not tell personal stories, so much as he will always be pointing,
like John the Baptist in that painting by Grunewald, pointing to the crucified one. Because if the preacher points to him or herself, the cause is lost.
"He must increase." This is the story of Christ.
"I must decrease." This is not about me.
The proclamation of the church embodied in her preachers does not reveal the preacher nor the Scriptures. The proclamation reveals Christ, and him crucified.
"May I never boast of anything
except the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ".
"a new creation is everything!"
Likewise, when you see the presider at the table, you better not be caught looking at him. Preaching is not about the preacher, neither is presiding about the presider. I'll be at that altar in a few minutes. And when I'm praying that great prayer of thanksgiving for you, don't look at me. Don't care about my voice. Don't care about my haircut.
No – Look at the cross. Look at the altar. Look at the bread and wine. Look there because that is how we do what we do, this is how we live out the Christian vocation, as a church, as a baptized people, a people baptized into the death and resurrection of Christ, this is how we do crucifixion and resurrection: we signify our lives of crucifixion and resurrection by passing through the waters of baptism to our place at this table, participating in the crucifixion and the resurrection, at this table becoming what we point to.
We remember God's acts in history, we remember his crucifixion, we remember is resurrection, and we do what he asked us to do: "This is my body which is broken for you." "This is my blood which is shed for you.” Take and eat. Take and drink. "When you do this, you do this in remembrance of me."
Look at what is being pointed to: Christ and his crucifixion, the resurrection of Christ, each remembered and made true at this altar.
Take and eat, take and drink, become the body of Christ.
Because this is what makes us who we are: not the preacher, not the presider. We are made Christ, as we reveal and witness to Christ, the crucifixion and the resurrection become our own by pointing to the one greater than us, and by this pointing to the one greater than we are, by speaking his words, by participating in him at this table, then we become the one who has been lifted up from the dead, we become the body of Christ, and him crucified.
Saturday, June 16, 2007
The New Layout
If you are someone who regularly looks for sermons from St. Mary Magdalene here at Red Eggs for the Emperor, you may have noticed a few changes. The reason for the changes is to integrate the blog into St. Mary Magdalene's new website. Click on through, and it will all make sense . . .
Sunday, June 03, 2007
Trinity Sunday (2007): :The Church’s “Funny Math”: The Story of the Trinity"
Trinity Sunday (2007): "The Church’s “Funny Math”: The Story of the Trinity"
Proverbs 8:1-4, 22-31; Psalm 8; Romans 5:1-5; John 16:12-15
preached by Jane Barter Moulaison, June 3rd
This past week I attended the Canadian Theological Society meeting in Saskatoon. I heard an Anglican theologian reflect on about how, when she was training for the priesthood, her rector asked her to prepare a sermon on the trinity. She did so, preached the sermon, and her rector declared that he was very grateful to her because he had managed to preach each Sunday for twenty years and avoid the topic of the trinity altogether!
For many, talk of the trinity has become difficult, obscure, even incoherent. I had a Jewish friend who used to call the doctrine Christians’ “funny math.” Christians just don’t make any sense when they claim that God is three in one. Three persons in one being. All of it smacks of a speculation of irrelevancy. What could the doctrine of the trinity possibly teach us that would matter?
When a child or a student comes to us with questions, these are generally of two types. One is the kind of question that arises from curiosity: a question which seeks to resolve a problem. How do you grow tomatoes from seed? How did you and Dad meet? Who attends General Synod? By and large, for questions such as these, there is a limited response that will generally satisfy the curiosity of the questioner.
But there are other kinds of questions that can be asked, and those are the questions, not of curiosity, but ones which demand wisdom; the wisdom of the respondent to dig into her memory and intellect, to try to bring to the surface those things that are implicit, that form the deepest part of us. These are the questions that will try to bring to language the unspoken background of our lives. What is our responsibility for this earth? Why do you and Dad love one another? Why the Church?
The Psalm that we have heard this morning asks such a question of God: What are human beings that you are mindful of them, mortals that you care for them?
Responses to these questions require depth and nuance. And they require that which cannot be contained in words—they evoke emotion, conviction and a way of life. They are the questions that once asked require a lifetime of response.
And thankfully, these difficult types of questions are not determined on our own. We are not the sole tellers of the story; indeed, as the Proverbs reading for this morning claims, God, personified as Wisdom, seeks us out and makes certain that we will not be satisfied with the simplistic answer. Wisdom calls us instead to know her.
8: 1 Does not wisdom call, and does not understanding raise her voice?
8:2 On the heights, beside the way, at the crossroads she takes her stand;
8:3 beside the gates in front of the town, at the entrance of the portals she cries out: To you, O people, I call, and my cry is to all that live.
God seeks us out in our questioning and our doubt, and God the Holy Spirit, leads to the truth: in the front of the town, at the thresholds of our lives, to us all, God does not leave us abandoned to figure out this life on our own. Instead, as the readings today attest, God reveals the truth of our lives by coming among us.
The problem with the trinity, historically and to this day, is that folks often confused the two types of questions, asking the Trinity to solve a problem once and for all rather than being the beginning of our conversation. In short, we asked the trinity to satisfy the demands of curiosity rather than being faithful to Holy Wisdom.
This happened in the very beginning of the church’s history when those who attacked and scorned the Christian church asked the Early Church how they, Jewish followers of Jesus, those who insist that there is only one God, could possibly worship this “man who appeared recently?”
It is the same question as that posed by my Jewish – the funny math question. How can three—Father, Son and Spirit—be one?
This very question preoccupied Jesus’ followers for the next four centuries. While those who mocked the church in these early times demanded that they be given a neat, logical answer, the Church responded instead with wisdom, with a story, not their own, but one given to them by the Holy Spirit. As Christ predicted in the gospel reading for today, that Spirit would take all that was Christ’s and declare it to them. And so, the story that Christians tell is the story of the love of God for the world called trinity.
Without that story of God’s love for the world, we are not only unable to respond to our opponents, but we also cannot make sense of God or of ourselves.
So what is this story that I claim is the story of God’s love for the world?
This story has three characters, whose unity in intention is perfect and complete. And so this story tells us that the very essence of God is relationship. That like us, God exists for and in the nexus of relationship.
God is understood then as a God for others, one who is involved in the deeply personal love of a parent and his progeny, and in the specific and special love of a father and a son. Yet the Trinity is not an idea about relationships, it is the relationship between God whom Jesus called Abba and his beloved son.
If we want to know what God looks like, we look to Christ who exists for others. We look to Christ, whose whole being was directed to the love of God and to the love of God’s people. We don’t attempt to freeze Christ in time, but his holiness, his incarnate nature, is revealed in relationship in being for God and in being for the world.
If I were to ask you to describe someone who is good, who has passed on, what would you say? Selfless, kind, thoughtful, considerate. But after a while you would run out of adjectives, and I would still want to know more. And in order to tell me more you would have to tell me a story. A story which inevitably involves other characters, and a story of course happens in time. I remember when she organized a charity for a family that had lost their home to fire. I remember how he cared for his wife when she was dying. We cannot know someone apart from their stories of relations with others through time.
The trinity is like this. It is not a dry concept or a philosophical argument, but it is a story in time. It begins with the character, God, who is maker of heaven and earth, of everything in the world seen and unseen. That there is, the trees the earth the seas, the life that pulses and surges unseen within and beyond us, all of those are from God’s overflowing gift.
The Trinity is the name we give to our Christian story of salvation. It is the adventure story of God taking on flesh uniquely and for all time, in time. Because he loves us. It is the story of a man so uniquely identified with God that there is nothing within him that rebels or fails to display God’s own beauty. He is pure light from light. There is no darkness within him. There is no darkness or vice that he can possibly wield upon the world. There has never been anyone like him—he is, of one being with the Father. As the reading from Proverbs that we have heard this morning puts it: “then he was beside him, like a master worker; and he was daily his delight, rejoicing before him always, rejoicing in his inhabited world and delighting in the human race.”
But this is not all, for the very nature of the love Christ shares with God is not to be hoarded or concealed, but breaks forth in the acts of our salvation. In a life that identifies fully with our own lives, even to the point of the misery of death. The story that we Christians call the trinity is the story of love that is stronger than death, of a love that cuts through time first in a tomb, in a world that could not contain such a love. And so, even as the story centres upon Christ’s return to his beloved father, but also reaches into our own time, and beyond our time, to a time in which this kingdom of perfect love, mutuality, self-donation, will have no end.
Finally, the Trinity is that name we Christians give to our story of salvation through the Holy Spirit. A Spirit abiding, a spirit that hovered over the creation of the world, a spirit that lit the prophets on fire, and a spirit that brooded and groaned in Christ’s death. It is that same spirit that girded up the frightened apostles and sent them out into the city, and it is this spirit who abides because Christ has promised not to leave us alone. It is this Spirit that awakens us to the love of God for the world in the wordless joy that is the eucharist. It is this spirit that transforms us from one alone, from strangers, to a communion of those who love God and one another.
Life in the trinity, then, can never be a life lived for ourselves, and the mystery of it is that such a life is far more abundant than the life we hoard and keep and preserve, the life in which we build defences and seek to protect that limited parcel that seems to be ours. All of the things I have learned in this life can be reduced to this: once I was alone and terrified and small, and the Spirit sought me out, and changed all that. The greatest gifts, the greatest joys, the greatest meaning that I have participated in always have to do with what Saint Paul in today’s epistle describes as “God's love … poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit.”
And so, if there is funny math here in the doctrine that one plus one plus one makes one, we are not to be embarrassed. Indeed, we can even be so foolish as to say that one plus, one plus, one plus the Christians gathered here today, add the Christians gathered across the world, plus the Christians throughout time make one. We might even go so far to say that were we to take this one and subtract and deprive it of all the worlds’ gains and measures – take away wealth, take away power, take away health, take away security--we would still be one. Within the doctrine of the trinity, within God’s story of love for the world, all this makes perfect and wonderful sense.
Proverbs 8:1-4, 22-31; Psalm 8; Romans 5:1-5; John 16:12-15
preached by Jane Barter Moulaison, June 3rd
This past week I attended the Canadian Theological Society meeting in Saskatoon. I heard an Anglican theologian reflect on about how, when she was training for the priesthood, her rector asked her to prepare a sermon on the trinity. She did so, preached the sermon, and her rector declared that he was very grateful to her because he had managed to preach each Sunday for twenty years and avoid the topic of the trinity altogether!
For many, talk of the trinity has become difficult, obscure, even incoherent. I had a Jewish friend who used to call the doctrine Christians’ “funny math.” Christians just don’t make any sense when they claim that God is three in one. Three persons in one being. All of it smacks of a speculation of irrelevancy. What could the doctrine of the trinity possibly teach us that would matter?
When a child or a student comes to us with questions, these are generally of two types. One is the kind of question that arises from curiosity: a question which seeks to resolve a problem. How do you grow tomatoes from seed? How did you and Dad meet? Who attends General Synod? By and large, for questions such as these, there is a limited response that will generally satisfy the curiosity of the questioner.
But there are other kinds of questions that can be asked, and those are the questions, not of curiosity, but ones which demand wisdom; the wisdom of the respondent to dig into her memory and intellect, to try to bring to the surface those things that are implicit, that form the deepest part of us. These are the questions that will try to bring to language the unspoken background of our lives. What is our responsibility for this earth? Why do you and Dad love one another? Why the Church?
The Psalm that we have heard this morning asks such a question of God: What are human beings that you are mindful of them, mortals that you care for them?
Responses to these questions require depth and nuance. And they require that which cannot be contained in words—they evoke emotion, conviction and a way of life. They are the questions that once asked require a lifetime of response.
And thankfully, these difficult types of questions are not determined on our own. We are not the sole tellers of the story; indeed, as the Proverbs reading for this morning claims, God, personified as Wisdom, seeks us out and makes certain that we will not be satisfied with the simplistic answer. Wisdom calls us instead to know her.
8: 1 Does not wisdom call, and does not understanding raise her voice?
8:2 On the heights, beside the way, at the crossroads she takes her stand;
8:3 beside the gates in front of the town, at the entrance of the portals she cries out: To you, O people, I call, and my cry is to all that live.
God seeks us out in our questioning and our doubt, and God the Holy Spirit, leads to the truth: in the front of the town, at the thresholds of our lives, to us all, God does not leave us abandoned to figure out this life on our own. Instead, as the readings today attest, God reveals the truth of our lives by coming among us.
The problem with the trinity, historically and to this day, is that folks often confused the two types of questions, asking the Trinity to solve a problem once and for all rather than being the beginning of our conversation. In short, we asked the trinity to satisfy the demands of curiosity rather than being faithful to Holy Wisdom.
This happened in the very beginning of the church’s history when those who attacked and scorned the Christian church asked the Early Church how they, Jewish followers of Jesus, those who insist that there is only one God, could possibly worship this “man who appeared recently?”
It is the same question as that posed by my Jewish – the funny math question. How can three—Father, Son and Spirit—be one?
This very question preoccupied Jesus’ followers for the next four centuries. While those who mocked the church in these early times demanded that they be given a neat, logical answer, the Church responded instead with wisdom, with a story, not their own, but one given to them by the Holy Spirit. As Christ predicted in the gospel reading for today, that Spirit would take all that was Christ’s and declare it to them. And so, the story that Christians tell is the story of the love of God for the world called trinity.
Without that story of God’s love for the world, we are not only unable to respond to our opponents, but we also cannot make sense of God or of ourselves.
So what is this story that I claim is the story of God’s love for the world?
This story has three characters, whose unity in intention is perfect and complete. And so this story tells us that the very essence of God is relationship. That like us, God exists for and in the nexus of relationship.
God is understood then as a God for others, one who is involved in the deeply personal love of a parent and his progeny, and in the specific and special love of a father and a son. Yet the Trinity is not an idea about relationships, it is the relationship between God whom Jesus called Abba and his beloved son.
If we want to know what God looks like, we look to Christ who exists for others. We look to Christ, whose whole being was directed to the love of God and to the love of God’s people. We don’t attempt to freeze Christ in time, but his holiness, his incarnate nature, is revealed in relationship in being for God and in being for the world.
If I were to ask you to describe someone who is good, who has passed on, what would you say? Selfless, kind, thoughtful, considerate. But after a while you would run out of adjectives, and I would still want to know more. And in order to tell me more you would have to tell me a story. A story which inevitably involves other characters, and a story of course happens in time. I remember when she organized a charity for a family that had lost their home to fire. I remember how he cared for his wife when she was dying. We cannot know someone apart from their stories of relations with others through time.
The trinity is like this. It is not a dry concept or a philosophical argument, but it is a story in time. It begins with the character, God, who is maker of heaven and earth, of everything in the world seen and unseen. That there is, the trees the earth the seas, the life that pulses and surges unseen within and beyond us, all of those are from God’s overflowing gift.
The Trinity is the name we give to our Christian story of salvation. It is the adventure story of God taking on flesh uniquely and for all time, in time. Because he loves us. It is the story of a man so uniquely identified with God that there is nothing within him that rebels or fails to display God’s own beauty. He is pure light from light. There is no darkness within him. There is no darkness or vice that he can possibly wield upon the world. There has never been anyone like him—he is, of one being with the Father. As the reading from Proverbs that we have heard this morning puts it: “then he was beside him, like a master worker; and he was daily his delight, rejoicing before him always, rejoicing in his inhabited world and delighting in the human race.”
But this is not all, for the very nature of the love Christ shares with God is not to be hoarded or concealed, but breaks forth in the acts of our salvation. In a life that identifies fully with our own lives, even to the point of the misery of death. The story that we Christians call the trinity is the story of love that is stronger than death, of a love that cuts through time first in a tomb, in a world that could not contain such a love. And so, even as the story centres upon Christ’s return to his beloved father, but also reaches into our own time, and beyond our time, to a time in which this kingdom of perfect love, mutuality, self-donation, will have no end.
Finally, the Trinity is that name we Christians give to our story of salvation through the Holy Spirit. A Spirit abiding, a spirit that hovered over the creation of the world, a spirit that lit the prophets on fire, and a spirit that brooded and groaned in Christ’s death. It is that same spirit that girded up the frightened apostles and sent them out into the city, and it is this spirit who abides because Christ has promised not to leave us alone. It is this Spirit that awakens us to the love of God for the world in the wordless joy that is the eucharist. It is this spirit that transforms us from one alone, from strangers, to a communion of those who love God and one another.
Life in the trinity, then, can never be a life lived for ourselves, and the mystery of it is that such a life is far more abundant than the life we hoard and keep and preserve, the life in which we build defences and seek to protect that limited parcel that seems to be ours. All of the things I have learned in this life can be reduced to this: once I was alone and terrified and small, and the Spirit sought me out, and changed all that. The greatest gifts, the greatest joys, the greatest meaning that I have participated in always have to do with what Saint Paul in today’s epistle describes as “God's love … poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit.”
And so, if there is funny math here in the doctrine that one plus one plus one makes one, we are not to be embarrassed. Indeed, we can even be so foolish as to say that one plus, one plus, one plus the Christians gathered here today, add the Christians gathered across the world, plus the Christians throughout time make one. We might even go so far to say that were we to take this one and subtract and deprive it of all the worlds’ gains and measures – take away wealth, take away power, take away health, take away security--we would still be one. Within the doctrine of the trinity, within God’s story of love for the world, all this makes perfect and wonderful sense.
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
Fourth Sunday of Easter (2007): “Why the Creed is Like Playing the Blues”
Fourth Sunday of Easter (2007): “Why the Creed is Like Playing the Blues”
Acts 9:36-43 ; Psalm 23 ; Revelation 7:9-17; John 10:22-30
preached by the Rev. Preston Parsons on April 19th, 2007
In 1971, Chester Burnett, better known as Chicago bluesman Howlin' Wolf, got on a plane with his guitarist Hubert Sumlin, and went to London England.
They went to London so they could do a recording with some blues-inspired English musicians, like Bill Wyman and Charlie Watts from the Rolling Stones, and Steve Winwood. Ringo Starr even sat in on one session. Guitar hero Eric Clapton sat in on all the sessions, and he’s the one that makes for the best story coming out of that London recording studio.
***
But first a word about the blues.
The blues is a relatively simple form; It's built around a chord progression only consists of three chords, a 1, a 4, and a 5 chord. These three chords are played in a repeating, 12 bar pattern, that has only a handful of variations. The blues is a relatively fixed form, without a great deal of variation within it. The form has rules, and if you want to play the blues, you stick close to the form. The form serves a regulative function: 12 bars, and three chords played in a particular order: you've got something close to the blues.
The strict rule of the blues, rather than being a hindrance to creativity, actually serves as a way of grounding creative work. It allows for a great deal of variation, even vastly different kinds of expressions, while remaining recognizable as the blues: you can have the Texas style of Stevie Ray Vaughn; the folk-rock style of Creedence Clearwater Revival; the psychedelic blues of Jimi Hendrix; you can have Eric Clapton on an acoustic guitar, playing in the style of Big Bill Broonzy.
All different styles; all recognizable as the blues, if you look at the simple underlying pattern: 3 particular chords, 12 bars.
**
This brings me back to Eric Clapton, and that London recording studio. Eric Clapton was a hot guitarist in 1971. But there he was, in a studio with a living legend, Howlin' Wolf. Eric Clapton thought he was hot stuff, but this old, grizzled, bluesman with failing kidneys kept grabbing Clapton's fingers while he played his guitar, saying "don't do it that way, you're doin' it wrong, c'mon, can't you play it right?"
The blues might be simple: 3 particular chords, 12 bars; with that you know it's the blues; but the simple rule doesn't mean it's easy to play.
Eric Clapton almost gave up. He almost left the studio. But Howlin' Wolf eventually picked up his own guitar, and played it himself. And we get to reap the benefit of an excellent recording of a Chicago bluesman playing "the Red Rooster" with a bunch of hot-shot young Englishmen.
***
I hope you have a question in your minds. What on earth or heaven does this have to do with the gospel? It has to do with one line, six words from our gospel: Jesus says: "The Father and I are one."
This was part of a significant debate in the early centuries of the church. How does Jesus relate to the Father? Here Jesus says that he and the Father are one, Jesus recognizing a kind of equality with the Father. But earlier on in the gospel of John Jesus said that the Father is greater than he is.
So which is it? Is Jesus equal to the Father? Or is the father greater than Jesus? How do you make a decision as to which is a faithful description of Jesus' relationship to the Father?
What Christians have done, since the earliest of times, is to understand scripture according to the Rule of Faith. There are fragments of Rules of Faith in the New Testament, there are fragments of rules of faith in the earliest Christian writings apart from the New Testament. Rules of faith serve a regulative function within Christian reflection on God and Jesus; they even help us understand scripture, because in rules of faith we already have the kernel of the gospel. Both the rules and the Scriptures proclaim salvation in Jesus Christ.
Just as we look back at the blues, and recognize it by the simple pattern of 3 particular chords and 12 bars, we recognize faithful Christian reflection according to the rule of faith. Just as anyone who wants to play the blues first learns the simple rule of the blues, in the same way the rule of faith, the creed we are about to say together, forms the foundation upon which we build what we say about God and Christ, allowing for a tremendous amount of creative reflection while remaining recognizably Christian.
***
The greatest of our Rules of Faith, the Nicene Creed that we will say in a moment, will help us with our current problem presented to us in John. Is Jesus equal and one with the Father? Or is Jesus inferior to the Father?
The creed, in its preservation of that driving force that arises out of Scripture, salvation in Christ, leads us to affirm that Jesus is one with the Father. If it is God that saves, and we proclaim that Jesus is saviour, then Jesus is equal, and one with the Father. At the same time, however, by affirming that Jesus became fully human, we can say that according to his humanity Jesus is less than the Father. By way of the creed we preserve the fullness of the proclamation of Scripture, because both Scripture and the creed arise from the same driving force: salvation in Christ.
Now I hope I didn't just lose too many of you. But I didn't say that this was going to be easy, did I! The blues was irritatingly hard for Eric Clapton to play in that recording studio with Howlin' Wolf that day in 1971, even if the form is simple. The creeds are simple, too, right? They're not that hard to say, and what they say is extremely important: salvation in Christ.
Even if the creeds are easy to say, I will grant that many find the creeds difficult to understand. But that doesn't mean we get to ignore them. Our creeds are the form upon which we build Christian reflection, and we need to be reminded of the form, despite the fact that the reflection, the life, the play, might all be difficult.
Just as you recognize the blues by the simple form, three particular chords, 12 bars; you recognize Christian reflection by fidelity to the form set out in the creeds. There's nothing to stop a musician from departing from the form of the blues; it's just that the farther you depart from the form, the harder it becomes to recognize the music as the blues. Similarly, the farther theological reflection departs from the creeds, the more difficult it becomes to recognize that reflection as Christian reflection.
This is no light subject, either, by the way; there is a lot at stake. What's at stake is the core of the Christian proclamation as it is found in Scripture: God saves us; he saves us in the person Jesus Christ; this salvation is total, and comprises the entirety of the human person, by his very taking on of our humanity in the incarnation; by the resurrection of his body we come to new life in the Spirit.
This is our proclamation; these are the words we live by; these are the words through which we play the Christian life. And for this: thanks be to God.
Acts 9:36-43 ; Psalm 23 ; Revelation 7:9-17; John 10:22-30
preached by the Rev. Preston Parsons on April 19th, 2007
In 1971, Chester Burnett, better known as Chicago bluesman Howlin' Wolf, got on a plane with his guitarist Hubert Sumlin, and went to London England.
They went to London so they could do a recording with some blues-inspired English musicians, like Bill Wyman and Charlie Watts from the Rolling Stones, and Steve Winwood. Ringo Starr even sat in on one session. Guitar hero Eric Clapton sat in on all the sessions, and he’s the one that makes for the best story coming out of that London recording studio.
***
But first a word about the blues.
The blues is a relatively simple form; It's built around a chord progression only consists of three chords, a 1, a 4, and a 5 chord. These three chords are played in a repeating, 12 bar pattern, that has only a handful of variations. The blues is a relatively fixed form, without a great deal of variation within it. The form has rules, and if you want to play the blues, you stick close to the form. The form serves a regulative function: 12 bars, and three chords played in a particular order: you've got something close to the blues.
The strict rule of the blues, rather than being a hindrance to creativity, actually serves as a way of grounding creative work. It allows for a great deal of variation, even vastly different kinds of expressions, while remaining recognizable as the blues: you can have the Texas style of Stevie Ray Vaughn; the folk-rock style of Creedence Clearwater Revival; the psychedelic blues of Jimi Hendrix; you can have Eric Clapton on an acoustic guitar, playing in the style of Big Bill Broonzy.
All different styles; all recognizable as the blues, if you look at the simple underlying pattern: 3 particular chords, 12 bars.
**
This brings me back to Eric Clapton, and that London recording studio. Eric Clapton was a hot guitarist in 1971. But there he was, in a studio with a living legend, Howlin' Wolf. Eric Clapton thought he was hot stuff, but this old, grizzled, bluesman with failing kidneys kept grabbing Clapton's fingers while he played his guitar, saying "don't do it that way, you're doin' it wrong, c'mon, can't you play it right?"
The blues might be simple: 3 particular chords, 12 bars; with that you know it's the blues; but the simple rule doesn't mean it's easy to play.
Eric Clapton almost gave up. He almost left the studio. But Howlin' Wolf eventually picked up his own guitar, and played it himself. And we get to reap the benefit of an excellent recording of a Chicago bluesman playing "the Red Rooster" with a bunch of hot-shot young Englishmen.
***
I hope you have a question in your minds. What on earth or heaven does this have to do with the gospel? It has to do with one line, six words from our gospel: Jesus says: "The Father and I are one."
This was part of a significant debate in the early centuries of the church. How does Jesus relate to the Father? Here Jesus says that he and the Father are one, Jesus recognizing a kind of equality with the Father. But earlier on in the gospel of John Jesus said that the Father is greater than he is.
So which is it? Is Jesus equal to the Father? Or is the father greater than Jesus? How do you make a decision as to which is a faithful description of Jesus' relationship to the Father?
What Christians have done, since the earliest of times, is to understand scripture according to the Rule of Faith. There are fragments of Rules of Faith in the New Testament, there are fragments of rules of faith in the earliest Christian writings apart from the New Testament. Rules of faith serve a regulative function within Christian reflection on God and Jesus; they even help us understand scripture, because in rules of faith we already have the kernel of the gospel. Both the rules and the Scriptures proclaim salvation in Jesus Christ.
Just as we look back at the blues, and recognize it by the simple pattern of 3 particular chords and 12 bars, we recognize faithful Christian reflection according to the rule of faith. Just as anyone who wants to play the blues first learns the simple rule of the blues, in the same way the rule of faith, the creed we are about to say together, forms the foundation upon which we build what we say about God and Christ, allowing for a tremendous amount of creative reflection while remaining recognizably Christian.
***
The greatest of our Rules of Faith, the Nicene Creed that we will say in a moment, will help us with our current problem presented to us in John. Is Jesus equal and one with the Father? Or is Jesus inferior to the Father?
The creed, in its preservation of that driving force that arises out of Scripture, salvation in Christ, leads us to affirm that Jesus is one with the Father. If it is God that saves, and we proclaim that Jesus is saviour, then Jesus is equal, and one with the Father. At the same time, however, by affirming that Jesus became fully human, we can say that according to his humanity Jesus is less than the Father. By way of the creed we preserve the fullness of the proclamation of Scripture, because both Scripture and the creed arise from the same driving force: salvation in Christ.
Now I hope I didn't just lose too many of you. But I didn't say that this was going to be easy, did I! The blues was irritatingly hard for Eric Clapton to play in that recording studio with Howlin' Wolf that day in 1971, even if the form is simple. The creeds are simple, too, right? They're not that hard to say, and what they say is extremely important: salvation in Christ.
Even if the creeds are easy to say, I will grant that many find the creeds difficult to understand. But that doesn't mean we get to ignore them. Our creeds are the form upon which we build Christian reflection, and we need to be reminded of the form, despite the fact that the reflection, the life, the play, might all be difficult.
Just as you recognize the blues by the simple form, three particular chords, 12 bars; you recognize Christian reflection by fidelity to the form set out in the creeds. There's nothing to stop a musician from departing from the form of the blues; it's just that the farther you depart from the form, the harder it becomes to recognize the music as the blues. Similarly, the farther theological reflection departs from the creeds, the more difficult it becomes to recognize that reflection as Christian reflection.
This is no light subject, either, by the way; there is a lot at stake. What's at stake is the core of the Christian proclamation as it is found in Scripture: God saves us; he saves us in the person Jesus Christ; this salvation is total, and comprises the entirety of the human person, by his very taking on of our humanity in the incarnation; by the resurrection of his body we come to new life in the Spirit.
This is our proclamation; these are the words we live by; these are the words through which we play the Christian life. And for this: thanks be to God.
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Third Sunday in Easter (2007): "Gone Fishin' "
Third Sunday in Easter (2007): "Gone Fishin' "
Acts 9:1-6, (7-20); Psalm 30; Revelation 5:11-14; John 21:1-19
preached by the Rev. Preston Parsons
So – Jesus is crucified, and he rises again. He appears to his disciples, miraculously entering locked rooms, not as some ghost, but as a body that can be touched, a body that breathes. This Jesus is worshipped, called Lord. The world has changed, the renewal of the world has begun in the body of a crucified God.
So – you're the disciples of this God, and after all this, all these miracles, what do you do? Well, you go fishing!
We know that eventually the disciples do go all over the world, bringing the good news of God in Christ, the good news of the resurrection, to all sorts of people. They even they perform miracles. But for now? What do they do? They go fishing.
I love that, actually. I even think it's important. Not important because there is something special about fishing, but because what the disciples do is go back to the routines of life, the routines of life that includes work. And for these guys work is fishing.
Jesus doesn't appear, for this last time in the Gospel of John, in any special way. The resurrected Jesus comes while the disciples are simply going about the mundane routines of life. Kind of like Jesus showing up at the loading dock and giving some advice to the truck driver about backing up, or like showing up in the warehouse to help stack boxes, or showing up at the water cooler to tell you how to reboot your computer. Jesus said, "fishing not too good today, huh?" They said, "No." He said to them, "throw your net to the other side of the boat, and you'll catch some." So they did this, and they caught a whole lot of fish. Jesus appears to fishermen, by the sea of Galilee, and offers fishermen fishing advice, providing a working miracle.
You'd think there were far more important things for a risen Jesus to do, but I guess once you've risen from the dead you just want to hang out. "Whatcha doin?" "Going fishing." "Can I come with?" And in this miracle, through the catching of fish, the man on the beach is revealed to be Jesus, Lord and King.
***
But we know this, don't we? We know that Jesus is revealed to us especially in the mundane routines of life? Or do we look for the intervention of the divine only in the big stuff? Only in the miracles of healing, only in ecstatic moments of prayer? Surely Jesus is revealed in the big stuff, but do we believe that Jesus is revealed in the small stuff?
I'll make a confession. I've caught myself, when I'm really late, praying for a parking spot. I don't know that I should do that! But if Jesus is with us, at all times, in all the mundane aspects of our life, maybe it makes sense.
***
Whether Jesus ever helps me find a parking spot, I don't know, but as we read this passage we find that Jesus is certainly present in another of the mundane parts of the lives of the disciples. Jesus is concerned that they get something to eat.
"Jesus said to them, Come and have breakfast." "Jesus came and took the bread and gave it to them, and did the same with the fish."
Whether Jesus is my co-pilot and helps me find my parking spot I don't know. But Christians have been certain, throughout the centuries, that Jesus is present in at least one of the most mundane routines of life, that of eating. We are about to share a meal together, right? And celebrate the sign of Jesus' presence in the simple act of breaking of bread? We do this because of the stories that we have of Jesus breaking bread with his disciples at the last supper, on the road to Emmaus, and on the beach by the Sea of Galilee.
Jesus is present with us here, today, at the Eucharistic table, in order that he might inhabit all the mundane parts of our lives, our work, the most boring and (what seem to be) the most unproductive parts of our lives.
Jesus is present with us in the most ordinary of acts, the breaking of bread and the sharing of a meal, because by this he is revealed to be for us the risen Lord and Saviour.
Acts 9:1-6, (7-20); Psalm 30; Revelation 5:11-14; John 21:1-19
preached by the Rev. Preston Parsons
So – Jesus is crucified, and he rises again. He appears to his disciples, miraculously entering locked rooms, not as some ghost, but as a body that can be touched, a body that breathes. This Jesus is worshipped, called Lord. The world has changed, the renewal of the world has begun in the body of a crucified God.
So – you're the disciples of this God, and after all this, all these miracles, what do you do? Well, you go fishing!
We know that eventually the disciples do go all over the world, bringing the good news of God in Christ, the good news of the resurrection, to all sorts of people. They even they perform miracles. But for now? What do they do? They go fishing.
I love that, actually. I even think it's important. Not important because there is something special about fishing, but because what the disciples do is go back to the routines of life, the routines of life that includes work. And for these guys work is fishing.
Jesus doesn't appear, for this last time in the Gospel of John, in any special way. The resurrected Jesus comes while the disciples are simply going about the mundane routines of life. Kind of like Jesus showing up at the loading dock and giving some advice to the truck driver about backing up, or like showing up in the warehouse to help stack boxes, or showing up at the water cooler to tell you how to reboot your computer. Jesus said, "fishing not too good today, huh?" They said, "No." He said to them, "throw your net to the other side of the boat, and you'll catch some." So they did this, and they caught a whole lot of fish. Jesus appears to fishermen, by the sea of Galilee, and offers fishermen fishing advice, providing a working miracle.
You'd think there were far more important things for a risen Jesus to do, but I guess once you've risen from the dead you just want to hang out. "Whatcha doin?" "Going fishing." "Can I come with?" And in this miracle, through the catching of fish, the man on the beach is revealed to be Jesus, Lord and King.
***
But we know this, don't we? We know that Jesus is revealed to us especially in the mundane routines of life? Or do we look for the intervention of the divine only in the big stuff? Only in the miracles of healing, only in ecstatic moments of prayer? Surely Jesus is revealed in the big stuff, but do we believe that Jesus is revealed in the small stuff?
I'll make a confession. I've caught myself, when I'm really late, praying for a parking spot. I don't know that I should do that! But if Jesus is with us, at all times, in all the mundane aspects of our life, maybe it makes sense.
***
Whether Jesus ever helps me find a parking spot, I don't know, but as we read this passage we find that Jesus is certainly present in another of the mundane parts of the lives of the disciples. Jesus is concerned that they get something to eat.
"Jesus said to them, Come and have breakfast." "Jesus came and took the bread and gave it to them, and did the same with the fish."
Whether Jesus is my co-pilot and helps me find my parking spot I don't know. But Christians have been certain, throughout the centuries, that Jesus is present in at least one of the most mundane routines of life, that of eating. We are about to share a meal together, right? And celebrate the sign of Jesus' presence in the simple act of breaking of bread? We do this because of the stories that we have of Jesus breaking bread with his disciples at the last supper, on the road to Emmaus, and on the beach by the Sea of Galilee.
Jesus is present with us here, today, at the Eucharistic table, in order that he might inhabit all the mundane parts of our lives, our work, the most boring and (what seem to be) the most unproductive parts of our lives.
Jesus is present with us in the most ordinary of acts, the breaking of bread and the sharing of a meal, because by this he is revealed to be for us the risen Lord and Saviour.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
